Moritz, I might call it port-reflect.
I would make it an egg first and maybe if there is high enough demand promote it to core. On Aug 8, 2010, at 23:24, Felix <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Moritz Heidkamp <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Suggestion for the ports unit: port-pipe > Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:52:34 +0200 > >> Felix <[email protected]> writes: >>> I'd call it `port-copy'. >> >> I thought of that, too, but it sounds like it would copy the port >> objects rather than stream their contents. Maybe `port-stream'? I'm not >> sure :-) What do you think about its usefulness? I might as well just >> make an egg for it if you think it's too specific to be included in the >> core distribution. > > Hm. Perhaps `port-copy-contents' or `port-copy-data'? > > It's trivial enough to be added to `ports', I guess. On the other hand > there already is enough stuff in the core libs. I can't say. > > > cheers, > felix > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
