On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Felix wrote: > Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that > should be taken into account?
Maybe equal?* or equal*? or something? Or equal/=? or equal=? or equal?/= The equal?? is a bit confusing because the SSAX tools already use the double-questionmark convention for procedures that, when applied to an argument, return predicate procedures (ie, predicate-makers). See http://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/sxpath and search for '??'. I know SSAX isn't exactly "idiomatic" Scheme or a great example, but I think theirs is a fine convention. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
