On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:22:07PM +0200, Felix wrote: > >> Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that > >> should be taken into account? > > > > How about "structurally-equal?" A little long, but very clear. > > > > But isn't equal? also structurally-equal? ? > > What about `same?' or `similar?' ?
That's so vague it could mean anything! ;) How about "inexactly-equal?" Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
