Hi Jim, On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:11:30 -0600 Jim Ursetto <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a test distribution tarball of stability/4.8.0 [1]. > This should contain everything that will go into 4.8.0.1 unless we > find a problem. If anyone would like to test it, it would be > appreciated. I also pushed the patches to the throw-away > tmp/stability/4.8.0 branch [2] in my github account. > > You can see what's included by looking at NEWS [3] or NEWS.stability. [4] > > [1] http://3e8.org/pub/chicken/stability-tmp/chicken-4.8.0-c4edbf1.tar.gz > [2] https://github.com/ursetto/chicken-core-stability/tree/tmp/stability/4.8.0 > [3] > https://raw.github.com/ursetto/chicken-core-stability/tmp/stability/4.8.0/NEWS > [4] > https://raw.github.com/ursetto/chicken-core-stability/tmp/stability/4.8.0/NEWS.stability I've tested your tarball on the following systems: Operating system GCC Hardware platform ------------------------+-------+------------------ Linux 4.7.2 x86 Linux 4.7.2 x86-64 FreeBSD 4.2.1 x86 Haiku 4.4.4 x86 Windows XP (mingw-msys) 4.5.2 x86 I run "make install" and "make check". Everything seems to be ok on those systems (except private repository test on Windows, which fails due to environment configuration problems, IIRC -- shell and make issues on that particular system). As mentioned on IRC, I've also run salmonella on the full set of eggs to compare the stability tarball to 4.8.0. The results are here: http://parenteses.org/mario/misc/salmonella-diff-4.8.0-stability/ It seems that there is no regression. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
