Hi, On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:40:34 +0100 Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:14:56PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: >> You're right, the SRFI-18 docs clearly state that an explicit #f is >> also allowed, not just leaving off the argument. >> >> Attached is a patch for this, which I nominate for inclusion in the >> stability branch. It's so trivial I didn't bother to add a NEWS >> entry; feel free to write one up if you think it's important. > > Git malfunctioned (or more likely, my brain did). Here's another try. Thanks. I've pushed your patch. I took the liberty of editing the patch summary to s/mutex-unlock!/mutex-lock!/. I also think this should go to stability. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
