> I've never understood this cygchicken-0.dll business. It's still being > built, and the core binaries are still linked against it. So I'm unsure > whether this patch is the Right Fix; I always assumed there was a reason > we had cygchicken-0.dll, and programs should be linked against it? > > Anyway, I don't understand a thing about this, but it seems to fix the > bug, so why not? I've attached a signed-off copy with a NEWS entry.
Sorry, I can't help here. It seems cygwin is doing some magic with regard to dlls, and I never figured out the exact behaviour. I'll sign off and push this patch, so that it might help Michele. Let's see if something breaks. felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
