Peter Bex scripsit: > I've never understood this cygchicken-0.dll business. It's still being > built, and the core binaries are still linked against it. So I'm unsure > whether this patch is the Right Fix; I always assumed there was a reason > we had cygchicken-0.dll, and programs should be linked against it?
I assume the reason for the name change is so that you can have both Cygwin and MinGW Chickens on the same box if you want to. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague. --Edsger Dijkstra _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
