On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 11:23:06AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
> 
> > It's marked as unimplemented, only the implementation itself is removed.
> > The posixunix version is kept around because people may actually be
> > using it.  
> 
> In that case, the posixwin implementation should throw an "Unsupported
> on Windows" exception, as for fork() and other such things.

That's what the patch does.  This mail and the previous suggest that
you haven't taken a look at it at the patch at all.  That's very
annoying.  Next time, please try to read the patch before asking
about things that are self-evident from a quick look at it.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net

_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers

Reply via email to