On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 03:20:50PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote: >> Another twist. Basically the same patch but with a more robust path >> manipulation strategy. > > Yeah, I was wondering why you were using string-append and friends > to manipulate paths :) > > I don't understand why you treat the extension and directory specially. > Neither the pathname separator nor the dot before the extension are > an X, so scanning backwards in the template will automatically stop > on those.
Right, maybe it's just too hot to write code here :) > Anyway, see my other mail for a simplified and tested patch. I can't try it but your changes looks good to me. Regards, Michele _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
