On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:31:54AM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > All in all, I think these changes are worthwhile but for the caveat > > that it results in us having NO MORE reserved type tags left! In > > fact, the complete change is only possible because we dropped the > > SWIG pointer type; before that we only had two reserved types left. > > I don't see an easy way to reclaim type tags elsewhere; we don't have > > that many. Maybe (but only MAYBE) we could get rid of lambda info as > > a separate core type. > > Maybe we can phase out the "tagged pointer" type? Having one reserved tag > left would be a good thing, IMHO.
I think we agree that one of the pointer types can go. I would like to re-focus on the patch(es) at hand. We can discuss the pointer changes further in a different thread, and/or at the summer meeting. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
