I disagree. On 2016-08-26 2:46, Elf wrote: > substring is an instance of a subset operation, and
It isn't, and neither is `substring=?`, which is a comparison procedure first and foremost. > I submit that it shouldn't be named substring It isn't, it's named `substring=?`, because it compares substrings. > I think the correct behaviour would be adding a check to the beginning > of the substring=? procedure, such that This would break commutativity for the base case and lead to general confusion. My two cents, current behaviour is fine. Evan _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
