On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart < mario.goul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not proposing doing anything with substring=?. The discussion > came up when I wrongly used substring=? in my code and thought it was > a bug. After reading and reflecting on what the documentation says, I > understand that substring=? is not buggy (although I still think it is > a bit convoluted). > IMO, the SRFI-13 string= is far easier to understand, because it specifies two strings and two start/end pairs. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org They do not preach that their God will rouse them A little before the nuts work loose. They do not teach that His Pity allows them to drop their job when they damn-well choose. --Rudyard Kipling, "The Sons of Martha"
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
