Hi Felix, On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 01:08:23 +0100 felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
>> Felix: what was the original intended behavior for -prefix, regarding >> handling of dependencies? > > IIRC, it was just a hack for overriding the installation prefix, among other > crude methods (CHICKEN_PREFIX, or CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX, or whatever, > I lost track...). > > It should go, IMHO. No prefix-overriding at all should be allowed. The question was actually related to C4, as the behavior of -prefix changed in 4.11 (see http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1298 ). Regarding C5, any idea on how to implement a tool like salmonella? All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
