Hi Peter, Thanks for looking into the patch.
On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 17:39:13 +0600 Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this would be a bit cleaner if it didn't rely on > data-structures. If I understand correctly, you're only using it for > "complement", which is trivial to implement directly. Actually `complement' is in chicken.base. I decided to use it because chicken.base is required anyway for `include', so that common-declarations.scm can be included. > I'm also not sure if the make rule is correct as-is, since it doesn't > depend on data-structures. The dependency on data-structures comes from chicken.string, for ->string, which is used in the original code of version>=?. All the best. Mario -- https://parenteses.org/mario
