> On 5 Oct 2025, at 07:53, Pietro Cerutti via Chicken-hackers > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> On 5 Oct 2025, at 07:02, Peter Bex via Chicken-hackers >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 10:28:50PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann via >> Chicken-hackers wrote: >>> I suggest to drop version<?, as it can be trivially created by >>> the user and there is already enough stuff of little use in the >>> core. >> >> Hm, I think it is actually fine to include this, but if we do, it would >> make more sense to include the "full set". We also have char<?, >> char<=?, char>?, char>=?, char=? for example. If this is too much, I'd >> agree with Felix and just provide the one predicate. > > Would it be too unschemeish to have a single version-compare that returns 'lt > 'le, 'eq, 'ge, or 'gt?
Of course I meant only 'lt, 'eq, and 'gt. And yes, -1, 0, and 1 would do as well. -- Pietro Cerutti I've pledged to give 10% of income to effective charities and invite you to join me. https://givingwhatwecan.org Sent from a small device - please excuse brevity and typos.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
