On 5/25/05, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would recommend to use spiffy instead iof the raw http extension.
Ack! Shame on me for not checking out spiffy! BTW, could you add a line
just after the http-server example telling people that they may want
to use spiffy instead? I assume there are people in the world
that, looking for an http server in Chicken, would first check for
"http-server" instead that for something called "spiffy" ;)
Michele Simionato
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
