On 11/19/05, Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 17 November 2005 14:23, felix winkelmann wrote: > > You will have to add reader-procedures (via set-read-synrax! > > or set-dispatch-read-syntax!) for the missing macros yourself > > and skip the contents. > > After reading about it, it seem I'll had to implement about 16 cases of > different string processing procedures, not nice indeed, any better > solution ? >
You only need to handle compiler-specifiic syntax, which is mainly #> ... <#- cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
