On Monday 21 November 2005 01:59, felix winkelmann wrote: > On 11/19/05, Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 17 November 2005 14:23, felix winkelmann wrote: > > > You will have to add reader-procedures (via set-read-synrax! > > > or set-dispatch-read-syntax!) for the missing macros yourself > > > and skip the contents. > > > > After reading about it, it seem I'll had to implement about 16 cases of > > different string processing procedures, not nice indeed, any better > > solution ? > > You only need to handle compiler-specifiic syntax, which is mainly > #> ... <#- Why ? I already handle that and I already encountered cases where I'd have to handle <<EOF and similar.
BTW, what should I return from my procedures that handle extensions. I was returning '() but that causes an error, I am now returning '(nevermind) since I don't care about it. Thank you. -- Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://pupeno.com)
pgp18BuRg4uHi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
