On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:54:24 +0200 "felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/3/07, Arto Bendiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Perhaps, then, we could use a form like (platforms ...) to indicate > > that an egg will only build on some specific platforms. One would > > probably like to refer to some existing build/package management > > platform for a good standard set of symbolic platform names, e.g.: > > linux, darwin (= Mac OS X), freebsd, win32, or whatever. > > I have added a "(platform ...)" property to > > http://chicken.wiki.br/Metafile reference > > This is enforced nowhere, just a convention. The property should hold > feature id's (symbols), as returned by "software-type", "build-platform", etc. Maybe it should be used only when the egg is platform-specific, since we have only a few eggs in this situation. If "(platform ...)" is ommited, it means that the egg is platform-independent. Otherwise, as far as I understand, we'd have to fill the "(platform ...)" section with every supported platform when the egg is platform-independent. What do you think? Best wishes, Mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
