Isn't a call to values completely equivalent to: (values v1 ...) => (call/cc (lambda (k) (k v1 ...)))
so (define (values . rest) (call/cc (lambda (k) (apply k rest)))) (which seems like the point that John is making)? Since call/cc is free in Chicken, wouldn't this be as fast as any procedure call (well, any procedure call which involves a procedure with a rest list)? Why mess with all the C_values etc? Or is this some sort of standards-compliance issue (I see a check for a "values continuation" in runtime.c)? Will _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
