On Feb 1, 2008 7:55 PM, Will Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kon, > > > would be expensive. You must create a closure, cons up a rest list, > and I bet that apply uses some C varargs magic that probably is much > slower than a straight function call.
Something like that, yes. > But, how hard would it be to > specify a re-write rule which takes effect after CPS conversion which > transforms > > (##sys#values k v1 ...) > > into > > (k v1 ...) > The "k" above is an "internal" procedure that is not the same as a normal user procedure or one created by "call/cc", unfortunately. It is also not possible (without static whole-world analysis) to infer whether "k" actually is a multival continuation. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
