On Feb 17, 2008 1:46 AM, Matt Gushee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does string= in Chicken return an integer because it is considered > more useful than #t? And if so, how? Or was it simply easier to > implement the function that way? >
It does this because chicken uses the reference implementation code originally by Olin Shivers. A decision that I greatly regret, as there were many bugs and the API generally is pretty uninspired. So, it isn't intentionally that way, it's just what the code does. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
