On Feb 17, 2008 11:56 AM, Jim Ursetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is all made a little more confusing by the lack of a > final question mark on the end of these predicates--which > sometimes indicates a "boolean-plus" value is intentionally being > returned; in other words, either #f or a useful true value. > Such is the case with memq, memv, etc. But the dropping of the ? > was, as far as I can tell, done for aesthetic reasons only. > Combine that with the historical baggage of the mismatch index > and the behavior of the reference implementation, and you have > a recipe for discombobulation. > > I hope this explanation made you feel a little better. ;) >
Thanks for this (explanation). Would anybody mind if we change string[=<>...] accordingly? cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
