Thinking more about it, I'm leaning MORE toward '() than before. I
also like relying
on a representation that's "standard" scheme rather than one that's
specifically part
of Chicken if we have the choice (and we do)
On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Ozzi wrote:
I suggest that a row be an a-list, and that null columns be
represented
by being non-existent in the a-list. If you end up preferring a
plain
list or a vector, then use (void) instead -- I am trying to get this
standardized as the Chicken representation of SQL's NULL.
Is there an argument against using '() instead of (void) SQL NULL
values?
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
