On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Ozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How is (sql-null?) harder or less intuitive? > It's not harder, but not being able to use null? to test for NULL is > counterintuitive in my eyes.
I know what you're saying. I guess I just like to keep my different types of nulls in different baskets. > Count me as on the fence I guess, between null void and sql-null. Sitting on the fence between null and void sounds like a scary place to be. :-) Graham The Tao that can be tested for equality with the Tao is not the true Tao. -- Chuang Tzu (paraphrased) _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
