Leonardo Valeri Manera scripsit: > Ok, so /binary/ programs that use silex in some way dont need to be > GPL'd because of that.
+1 > I take it that this means that silex is never a runtime dependency. I take it so too. > Does this mean distributing the c intermediates of an app along with > the chicken libraries (in c form) and eggs (again in c form) needed to > run it therefore has no need for silex either and can be distributed > under, for example, a BSD license? That's right. Of course, if you use a GPLed egg, you have to distribute Scheme source for your whole app. C source is obfuscated and doesn't count for GPL purposes. -- Is not a patron, my Lord [Chesterfield], John Cowan one who looks with unconcern on a man http://www.ccil.org/~cowan struggling for life in the water, and when [EMAIL PROTECTED] he has reached ground encumbers him with help? --Samuel Johnson _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
