On 20/03/2008, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'll revert the change. Apologies for causing confusion.
Felix, the actual documentation page for the egg still says GPL :) Also, I got this reply from Danny: On 20 Mar 2008 11:21:18 -0400, Danny Dubé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Leonardo, > > To be honest, I don't understand much about all those > licensing issues and I care even less. So, instead of trying to > interpret the situation and give a synthetic answer, I'll just tell > you what is. > > What I remember (it was many years ago) is that I had first > distributed SILex without any license included in the software. > Later, after someone asked about the licensing of SILex, I had added > the GPL to SILex and made it available this way. Except for the > license, the software was the same each time. AFAIK, both versions > are still available. > > Obviously, you have the non-licensed version in hand because, > otherwise, you would have seen the license. > > Now, what I don't know is: Is the non-licensed version covered > by the licensed one given that the software is essentially the same? > > If it were just for me, you can do whatever you want with > SILex. However, I don't know if you would still have problems despite > what I just wrote. > > That being said, I'm glad to see that SILex is used that much > and helps numerous people. > > Regards, > > Danny Does this make it more or less clear to us? Leo
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
