On 21/03/2008, Leonardo Valeri Manera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/03/2008, Tobia Conforto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seeing as you are in contact with him, and his intentions are pretty > > much a BSD-style license, why don't you ask him for permission to > > stick an actual BSD license on the code, explaining that doing so will > > help people use Silex without any more headaches? > > > A valid point. > > I've just shot off an email, will let you guys know :) > > Leo >
Well, that was quick, must have caught him in the office. On 20 Mar 2008 20:40:20 -0400, Danny Dubé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You ask me "Would you mind if...". I won't risk answering a plain > "yes" or "no" as, for the French speaker I am, that expression > confuses me. To make sure, I will answer that it's okay with me if > you do what you proposed. > > > Regards, > Danny > > "Leonardo Valeri Manera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Me again >_> > > > > It was pointed out on our mailing list that a BSD (or MIT) license > > would be very close to your "do whatever you want with the code" > > attitude, but prevent future headaches and make life easier for > > distribution packagers who have to specify what license each package > > is under. > > > > Would you mind if we put the silex egg (chicken libs are called eggs) > > under a BSD or MIT license, (c) Danny Dubé? > > > > Sorry to bother you again :) > > > > Leo So, yeah, go ahead :) Leo
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
