Graham, There is a thread entitled "thread-sleep! for less than a second" from 12 Jan 2007 which discusses this issue. Basically it was an either/or thing and the current way won. I just was not aware of the proper usage. I used Daishi's shorter solution and just made a local procedure in the egg.
On 4/7/08, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, defining (thread-sleep/microseconds!) in a separate unit seems an > expedient way around the problem. (Or we could extend our SRFI-18 and > add this procedure there -- just my two cents, but that seems like a > reasonable extension, given the commonality of compiling with > fixnum-arithmetic.) _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
