On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Jim Ursetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham, > > There is a thread entitled "thread-sleep! for less than a second" from 12 Jan > 2007 which discusses this issue. Basically it was an either/or thing and the > current way won. I just was not aware of the proper usage. I used Daishi's > shorter solution and just made a local procedure in the egg.
I'm glad it worked out, Jim. I was just a bit put off by all the arithmetic you had to go through, to effect a simple thread-sleep. I still think I might suggest a microsecond-sleep routine be added to srfi-18 (our srfi-18 already has extensions from the spec, one more couldn't hurt!). Best wishes, Graham _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
