Hi Alan, > you could then handle in an exception handler on your primary > stack, instead of the signal stack.
That sounds like the way to go. > If you set SIGPIPE to the chicken equivalent of SIG_IGN, any error > message writing to the pipe will be returned by write(2) instead, I'm not sure I followed you here. What's chicken's equivalent of SIG_IGN? Care to write a few lines of pesudo code to illustrate what you said? Thanks, --fungsin _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
