>>>>> Alan Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> I'm not sure I followed you here. What's chicken's equivalent of
>>>> SIG_IGN?
>>> (set-signal-handler! signal/pipe #f)
>> Come to think of it, there's no way to set SIG_DFL. What about
>> adding (set-default-signal-handler! signum) or changing the
>> signature of set-signal-handler! to accept a keyword (#:default,
>> #:ignore).
> I like the idea of #:default and #:ignore keywords to
> set-singnal-handler! over creating a new routine, though both suffer
> from the following "problem": In C, you can assign to default signal
> handler to the same type of variable as your own signal handler,
> meaning you can store the default signal handler away and treat it
> just like one of your own, toggling back and forth between it using
> the same routine, |signal|.
> You couldn't do that with either of these suggestions.
Why not to use #t for the default handler then?
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
