On 1/5/09, Shawn Rutledge <[email protected]> wrote: > However the trouble is that the name of the unbound variable (the name > of the function that was to be called) is still lost, even though the > warning prints it out.
Now by reading the source I've discovered ##sys#unbound-in-eval. I guess I can get the unbound variable name from there (and expect it to break some day) unless somebody has a better idea... _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
