Hi On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:38 -0800 "Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was under the impression that the QT egg was more a demo, then an > egg ment to be practical, and hence was *finished*. I'm not a Qt expert, but my impression is that when the documentation for the Qt egg says it's supposed to be incomplete, one of the meanings is that the egg tends to focus on the Qt features NOT provided by chicken and any other egg. A bunch of Qt features are provided by chicken itself or eggs, so, there's no reason to make bindings for those features. Best wishes. Mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
