So, Mario, you believe it only provides the GUI stuff, right? (just to check)
Regards, Arthur 2009/12/2 Mario Domenech Goulart <[email protected]> > Hi > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:38 -0800 "Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I was under the impression that the QT egg was more a demo, then an > > egg ment to be practical, and hence was *finished*. > > I'm not a Qt expert, but my impression is that when the documentation > for the Qt egg says it's supposed to be incomplete, one of the meanings > is that the egg tends to focus on the Qt features NOT provided by > chicken and any other egg. A bunch of Qt features are provided by > chicken itself or eggs, so, there's no reason to make bindings for those > features. > > Best wishes. > Mario >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
