Christian Kellermann <[email protected]> writes: > Hi John! > >> This is misleading. It should say "send a signal" instead of "message". >> The second clause is also misleading, because there is simply no >> response to wait for. >> >> Then the examples just need to be fixed up to use dbus:call instead of >> dbus:send. The second example uses dbus:send-and-await-reply, which >> isn't even part of the api. It seems to have a different call form from >> dbus:call, so we would have to examine that more closely and figure out >> what the intent was. > > First of all, thanks for your detailed report! As you are the first > user of this egg after a long time I would suspect some bitrot. > Please feel free to change the wiki page as you see fit and maybe > send patches for the egg to the author, maybe cc'ed to this list. > I hope you are not put off by all the dust that has set on this > extension. Let's make it better! > > Kind regards, > > Christian
Okay, great. For some reason I hadn't noticed that I could edit that page. I thought the egg pages were auto-generated from inline comments in the eggs themselves (or something). So I will work on cleaning that up and contact the author about the couple of bugs I've found in the code itself. Many thanks -- John Foerch _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
