Hi John, On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:55:54 -0400 John J Foerch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Christian Kellermann <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> This is misleading. It should say "send a signal" instead of "message". >>> The second clause is also misleading, because there is simply no >>> response to wait for. >>> >>> Then the examples just need to be fixed up to use dbus:call instead of >>> dbus:send. The second example uses dbus:send-and-await-reply, which >>> isn't even part of the api. It seems to have a different call form from >>> dbus:call, so we would have to examine that more closely and figure out >>> what the intent was. >> >> First of all, thanks for your detailed report! As you are the first >> user of this egg after a long time I would suspect some bitrot. >> Please feel free to change the wiki page as you see fit and maybe >> send patches for the egg to the author, maybe cc'ed to this list. >> I hope you are not put off by all the dust that has set on this >> extension. Let's make it better! > > Okay, great. For some reason I hadn't noticed that I could edit that > page. I thought the egg pages were auto-generated from inline comments > in the eggs themselves (or something). So I will work on cleaning that > up and contact the author about the couple of bugs I've found in the > code itself. Excellent. Documentation for eggs is usually manually written. As far as I know, nobody uses automatic extraction of comments from code. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
