* John J Foerch <[email protected]> [110316 17:59]: > Christian Kellermann <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi John! > > > >> This is misleading. It should say "send a signal" instead of "message". > >> The second clause is also misleading, because there is simply no > >> response to wait for. > >> > >> Then the examples just need to be fixed up to use dbus:call instead of > >> dbus:send. The second example uses dbus:send-and-await-reply, which > >> isn't even part of the api. It seems to have a different call form from > >> dbus:call, so we would have to examine that more closely and figure out > >> what the intent was. > > > > First of all, thanks for your detailed report! As you are the first > > user of this egg after a long time I would suspect some bitrot. > > Please feel free to change the wiki page as you see fit and maybe > > send patches for the egg to the author, maybe cc'ed to this list. > > I hope you are not put off by all the dust that has set on this > > extension. Let's make it better! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Christian > > > Okay, great. For some reason I hadn't noticed that I could edit that > page. I thought the egg pages were auto-generated from inline comments > in the eggs themselves (or something). So I will work on cleaning that > up and contact the author about the couple of bugs I've found in the > code itself.
Cool! You are not the first user not noticing that he could edit the page. What can we do to improve the situation there? I am asking because stuff like this gets forgotten quickly by newcomers and then it is all obvious...until the next new person shows up... Kind regards, Christian _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
