On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Bex scripsit: > >> We're actually still looking for a good way to handle this. Currently >> egg authors must contact one of the "usual suspects" to have them update >> or add a location. > > I think it's a Good Thing to have some human gatekeeping here. We really > don't want the egg repository filled with random eggs with misleading, > obscene, or spammy names.
Perhaps, even though I find that very unlikely. Human interaction shouldn't be more complicated than pushing a button somewhere to 'approve' said egg, tho. Everything else should be automated. -- Stephen _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
