On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Eilert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Peter Bex scripsit: >> >>> We're actually still looking for a good way to handle this. Currently >>> egg authors must contact one of the "usual suspects" to have them update >>> or add a location. >> >> I think it's a Good Thing to have some human gatekeeping here. We really >> don't want the egg repository filled with random eggs with misleading, >> obscene, or spammy names.
Otherwise known as the "rotten eggs"? (come on, someone had to say it) BTW, I'm excited about this system. I have a handful of things that I'd like to put out there and I hope this makes it easier or at least a bit less intimidating. > Perhaps, even though I find that very unlikely. > > Human interaction shouldn't be more complicated than pushing a button > somewhere to 'approve' said egg, tho. Everything else should be > automated. > > > -- Stephen > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
