> > I don't know why sleep(3) was implemented in the posix unit and usleep(3) was > not. thread-sleep! is preferable to either, though, in my opinion.
I think usleep(3) is not available on Windows. There is probably a win32 equivalent, though. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
