On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:57, J Altfas <p...@bmedctr.com> wrote:
> On Tues, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:30 -0600> Jim Ursetto wrote: > > > Hmm, I just realized scheduler.scm relies on nanosleep(3) on UNIX, so I > > guess it is safe to use in posix-extras as well. I'll change posix-extras > > to use nanosleep shortly. > > > > After all the discussion and further study the merits of nanosleep are > clearer, and it nicely accommodates the fractional time specifier idea--it > really is a good match. > > Because the idea was interesting I took the liberty to attempt a simple > implementation of a nanosleep-based scheme sleep function: Indeed, yesterday I changed posix-extras' sleep to use nanosleep() in 0.1.5. The implementation is essentially the same as yours but it also uses Sleep() on Windows. Jim _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
