Hello, Yes, it seems that copying/moving around large vectors puts a lot of pressure on the memory subsystem. Other than that, SRFI-4 vectors are fine.
Ivan On May 4, 2013 7:57 AM, "Thomas Chust" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2013-05-04 00:26, Ivan Raikov wrote: > > [...] > > I really strongly advise _against_ using SRFI-4 vectors for 4G files, > > as I have experienced serious performance issues even with vectors of a > > few million elements. > > [...] > > Hello, > > would that be related to the fact that CHICKEN has a copying garbage > collector or are there other hidden performance implications of SRFI-4 > vectors? > > Ciao, > Thomas > > > -- > When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb. > > > -- > When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb. > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
