That lays the type safety burden upon the developer at run time and not the compiler. On 28 Nov 2013 10:18, "Moritz Heidkamp" <mor...@twoticketsplease.de> wrote:
> Daniel Leslie <d...@ironoxide.ca> writes: > > > Go also enjoys a rather robust Channels system, which is sort of like > > Scheme's ports, only it's type-safe by design. > > How are Scheme ports not type-safe? The main difference is that Scheme > ports are limited to just a single type (i.e. characters) but that > doesn't make them type-unsafe, no? :-) > > Moritz >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
