On 2014-06-08 11:14, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:01:01PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > Peter Bex scripsit: > > > > > c) The port should not be reset, but the uri should be printed without > > > port if it's the default for this scheme. > > > > +1 for (c). > > hm, but if you really want to print http://foo:80/blabla, how > should that work?
In that case I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the user to define their own function to build a string from the URI's composite parts. We have to pick a default behavior one way or the other, and "without the port" seems like the better one to me. Regards, Evan _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
