Thank you Peter! With some manual testing, it's working like expected here.
K. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Peter Bex <peter....@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 02:19:22PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > So here's a new poll: > > > > a) The current behaviour of resetting port to #f if it's the default port > > for this scheme is ok. > > b) The port should not be reset, and the uri should be printed with an > > explicit port, even if it's the default for this scheme. > > c) The port should not be reset, but the uri should be printed without > > port if it's the default for this scheme. > > I have now implemented c), and tagged release 1.4. Please give it a try! > > Kris, thanks for reporting this problem. Thanks Andy, John and Evan > for supplying valuable feedback. Doing the right thing was tricky here. > > Cheers, > Peter > -- > http://www.more-magic.net >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
