Hi, On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:51:30 +0100 mfv <m...@freeshell.de> wrote:
> It is not that I am totally against emacs, but I must confess that > learning the myriad of cryptic commands would seriously strain my > patience. Mind you, I am writing this on Mutt/Freeshell now, which is > using emacs. As such, I have to state that I have no trouble using the > basic functionality of the editor. It just should not be too cryptic.. Despite being initially cryptic, I'd strongly recommend learning Emacs. It's a valuable and flexible tool that can be useful in many situations, not only for editing CHICKEN code. If you are familiar with Lisp languages (and I assume you are), Emacs can be programmed to do virtually whatever you want (including making it less cryptic to your taste)! Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
