Hi,
I have been tripped by the following mistake a few times:
(let ((hello 0))
(set! helo 1))
I meant to set! on hello. However, due to a typo, I did set! on helo. This
bug is extremely hard to debug to me. Is there a way to make Chicken give
warning on this? Or how do you handle this issue?
I know probably using set! is not a good programming style. I found that in
some situations it is hard to avoid set!.
Thank you!
Jinsong
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
