On Sep 29 2026, 13:52 +0000, "Diego A. Mundo" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29th, 2026 at 09:23, Pietro Cerutti <[email protected]> wrote:* https://lists.sr.ht/~fancycade/public-inbox/patches/68220 * https://lists.sr.ht/~fancycade/public-inbox/patches/68229Thanks Pietro,Regarding the first patch: I would hesitate to use "literal" just because it's not a standard sxml construct that can be handled by e.g. a generic sxml to html renderer (such as sxml-display-as-html in html-parser). Meanwhile parsing the html output of cmark into sxml should give you pretty much exactly equivalent sxml. Thoughts?
Honestly, I'd have to refresh my mind on this.. I 100% don't remember what I was after :/
Re the second patch: I do have some eggs that depend on pkg-config, but recently I've come to think it's another external dependency for the user, where I think the current egg will work more generally with judicious environment setup. I suppose I could be swayed, but I'd like to know what the general consensus on this is, if there is one.
I thought I'd made the pkg-config.scm module tolerant to there not being pkg-config, and fallback to the hardcoded flags, but looking at the patch, it doesn't look like it. I'll try to recover my local clone and see if I have improved it some.
-- Pietro Cerutti I have pledged to give 10% of income to effective charities and invite you to join me - https://givingwhatwecan.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
