me either on the web page thing. I hate reading it there, to me that defeats the purpose of getting it through email Sheila
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ETM Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:40 PM To: furdion Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Chihuahuas] Trimming posts I think the other list manages to put off a lot of subscribers by being so rule-aggressive but that's a personal opinion. If people top post, then the downloaded older messages can be re-read or ignored and the top posted reply read in the message window. I switched to digest on the other list, that usually means I won't be posting and more than likely won't be reading, that's because I so detest digest format. The fact is that I do like to know the original post is beneath the current post. I may rarely go to the older post, but I want to know it is there if I need to refresh memory and I prefer it in its entirety to a lopped off line or two that may not really reveal the original post's intent. But I am still *never* going to go the webpage to read webmail. Elaine Would a fly without wings be called a walk? Hello furdion On Monday, January 29, 2007, you wrote > It was mentioned on here that someone was > affronted by having to trim <snip>
